“Dumbledore is an academic and he believes that certain channels of communication should always remain open.”
Author J.K. Rowling has published a statement on Twitter, called "Why Dumbledore Went To The Hilltop", discussing the issue of morality in the Harry Potter series to help explain why she opposes a cultural boycott of Israel.
Rowling was one of over 150 people to co-sign a letter, published in The Guardian last week, against the boycott. In the letter the signatories wrote: "Cultural boycotts singling out Israel are divisive and discriminatory, and will not further peace."
However, following her inclusion in the letter, Rowling received backlash over the decision and it led to claims she is a Zionist supporter of Israel. So now she has explained her decision further, using her Harry Potter character Dumbledore to make her point.
Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images
The Palestinian community has suffered untold injustice and brutality. I want to see the Israeli government held to account for that injustice and brutality. Boycotting Israel on every possible front has its allure ... What sits uncomfortably with me is that severing contact with Israel's cultural and academic community means refusing to engage with some of the Israelis who are most pro-Palestinian, and most critical of Israel's government.
The scene – where Dumbledore is summoned to a hilltop to talk with Death Eater Severus Snape – supports Rowling's belief that conversation is key to resolving conflict.
"Dumbledore is an academic and he believes that certain channels of communication should always remain open," she writes. "It was true in the Potter books and it is true in life that talking will not change wilfully closed minds. However, the course of my fictional war was forever changed when Snape chose to abandon the course on which he was set, and Dumbledore helped him do it."
Warner Bros.
Those people are right, but only up to a clearly defined point. The Harry of six and a half books might not understand. Harry is reckless and angry for a considerable portion of those six and a half books and he has my whole-hearted sympathy ... There comes a moment in the final book, though, when Harry, whose natural inclination is to fight, to rush to action, to lead from the front, is forced to stop and consider the cryptic message the dead Dumbledore has left him.
0 comments:
Post a Comment